5 Tips for Building and Managing a World-Class Sales Organization

investing in employees.jpg

TL;DR: In order to build and run a world class sales org:

  1. It all starts with Ideal Customer Profile (ICP)

  2. Hire with your ICP in mind

  3. Ruthlessly disqualify bad deals

  4. Arm your sales managers

  5. Invest in your people, and help them carve career paths based on their strengths

5 Tips for Building and Managing a World Class Sales Organization

Do you need a sales team in order for your business to compete? 

One of my least favorite apocryphal corporate stories is the one about how Atlassian built a >$30B company without having to “sell” their product. It was just that good. 

This simply did not happen. Atlassian did rely on salespeople to grow. They just adopted a less traditional model of selling by leaning heavily on the channel for revenue. So instead of having internal Atlassian employees sell the product, third parties did. Other companies, like Dropbox and Slack, had their “no sales teams necessary” phases early on. But when competition heated up, and they began to notice competitors beating them into strategic accounts, each company changed its tune and invested in sales. 

The fact is, most companies need sales. Maybe not straight away. Maybe your product is that good, or the price is low enough to gain traction without the need for a high touch sales cycle. But if your company is lucky enough to begin selling into the market majority, and/or if your price point increases beyond a few hundred dollars a month, you will eventually need a sales team.

So how do build your charter sales team? And how do you structure and manage it so that it becomes a competitive force for your business? Below we’ll take a look at a few tips for building and managing a world class sales organization. 

1/ It all starts with Ideal Customer Profile (ICP)

We’ll talk a lot more about this in future posts, but ICP is the star at the center of the go-to-market solar system. Everything must orbit it. Ideal Customer Profile describes the types of companies you should target. Which industries are they in? How many employees do they have and how much do they earn? What are their business models? How do they monetize? What is their level of technological sophistication?

You need a clear understanding of what companies you will be selling to in order to make the right operational decisions. For example, you need ICP clarity in order to build functioning models that consider things like deal length, deal size, CAC, and other metrics. From there, you have a baseline to compare performance against; a hard requirement for any business that wants to be data-driven. 

Last, many otherwise strong companies struggle if their sales, marketing, customer success and product teams aren’t aligned on ICP. If you have different teams working hard but going in different directions, you’re in for a brutal journey. 

2/ Hire with your ICP in mind

An extension of point 1, having clarity as to what companies you’ll be selling to informs what the talent at your organization should look like. While important, this goes beyond simply hiring people who have domain experience. This has to do with the economics of the operation itself. 

For example, if you take a look at the sales team at Yelp, it should come as no surprise that it looks very different from the sales team at Workday. AEs at Yelp are running a ton of transactional, one-call-close deals in parallel and pounding the phones. You don’t get your own personal SDR to help out at Yelp. A Solutions Engineer isn’t riding shotgun screaming “Ride or die” with you. On the other hand,  AEs at Workday need a tremendous amount of support from sales development teams to break into their accounts, and due to the technical nature of the sale and audience, an SE is critical on the majority of (if not all) deals. 

Beyond this, your hiring team should be asking questions like “does the person seem to have authentic affinity for the market we’re selling into?” That sort of passion is palpable in a sales cycle. So is a lack of passion.


3/ Ruthlessly disqualify bad deals

A big pet peeve of sales leaders is inflated pipeline. Aside from making it difficult to forecast with accuracy, inflated pipeline is usually indicative of underlying bad habits. It’s one thing for a rep to be overly optimistic (in my experience, time-in-seat solves this problem naturally by turning salespeople into cynics), but it’s an entirely different thing if reps consistently lose or push “great” deals. The root cause of this is often either lack of qualification or poor qualification of deals. 

You can surface lack of qualification by asking your rep tough questions. “Is your champion really a champion? If so, what has he done to prove it?” 

Or, “Is your decision maker really the decision maker? If so, why can she not explain how a product like this is purchased or who is involved in the process?”

But poor qualification can be a bit trickier, and as a result more difficult to spot. You could have a very interested buyer who has jumped through the hoops you’ve put her through and done all the homework. She has introduced you to all the right people typically involved in a process like this. The boxes are checked, so we should feel good about the deal, right? This is where ICP clarity and the idea of customer pain + economic impact (we’ll discuss these topics in a future post about discovery and sales mechanics) come into play. If there is not a strong use case that’s been commonly solved with your product at similar companies, the need may not be strong. A new CFO could come in at the 11th hour and scrap the whole 12 month deal because the TL;DR of it wasn’t compelling.

In short, reps need that acute understanding of ICP and the willingness to ask tough questions to determine whether the deal is qualified. And, what’s more difficult, reps must be comfortable disqualifying bad deals early and often. Lean pipelines with high conversion rates and are the hallmark of stellar sales organizations.

4/ Arm your sales managers

There is no shortage of sales technology out there. However, the majority of it serves the actual act of selling. Lead/account enrichment, prospecting automation, CRM, forecasting, e-signatures… This should come as no surprise. First, what better way for software to make sales teams better than to make the process of selling easier/better/faster? Second, the size of the market of sales managers is relatively small, so founders are incentivized to build products that cater to individual contributors instead. 

In my experience, technology that empowers sales managers is scant (though if you know of great software that proves me wrong, I’d love to hear about it). The currency that powers sales leadership is visibility, as it’s important to know the state of the union at all times but impossible to maintain intimate knowledge of every one of your reps’ deals. Therefore, the tools that were most useful to me were the ones that granted that visibility and made it easy for everyone, especially the reps, to keep deal data up-to-date. 

As a sales leader, I found Datahug to be incredibly powerful. Its coaching functionality was particularly useful, which gave me visibility into how engaged reps were with their deals, how multi-threaded their deals were, whether next steps were set, and other useful signals. 

In recent years, I’ve taken a liking to Troops. I love that it syncs Salesforce to Slack. Through that integration, they’ve generally done a great job of making data easily accessible by not only sales managers but the overall company through things like natural language commands, customized alerting and workflows. 

A product I haven’t used personally but have been hearing great things about recently is Pathlight. It’s described as a sales manager intelligence hub, and what seems particularly compelling to me is how they make their deal analysis actionable (example below).

pathlight.png

5/ Invest in your people, and help them carve career paths based on their strengths

Losing great people sucks. I personally found it to be the worst part of being in a leadership role. People leave jobs for a variety of reasons, some of which are out of leadership’s control. Obviously, sales managers should be attentive and available and treat their people well -- after all, most people quit their bosses and not their companies

But even that is not enough in our hyper-competitive world. Beyond loving their company and liking their managers, salespeople should feel valued. They should have a sense of where they (might) be heading in their careers. 

Investing in your people is a no-brainer. Aside from the obvious benefits of making reps feel appreciated as knowledge workers, this is great for your bottom line as good training can improve all your KPIs. Products like Saleshood make training and enablement highly accessible to everyone. For more custom training program development, firms like TOPO (now a part of Gartner) run custom programs that I’ve found to be exceptional. 

Carving out the time to help your reps think about career path is not something I’ve personally relied on a tool for. It’s just something you have to take the time to do as a sales leader. These conversations can be fun and rewarding, and I have found that having a sense of where an employee wants to go is useful in giving them feedback. As a sales rep, some of my fondest memories are of conversations with managers who took the time to help me think about my future.

Recruiting in Competitive Markets

hi quality recruitment image.png

This week’s post is written by Sam Marelich. Sam is a Managing Partner at The Collective Search where he works exclusively with venture-backed startups, recruiting for revenue generating teams. 


“Are you considering starting up a business because you wish to work on wonderfully interesting technical problems all of the time? Stop now — Google is hiring, go get a job with them. 90% of the results of [starting] your business, and somewhere around 90% of the effort, are caused by non-coding activities.”

- Patrick McKenzie, Kalzumeus

So you’ve started a software company. You’ve got a product, some users, and raised some money to kick things into growth mode. Great! 

In order to make money, you need sales. If you want to sell things to other businesses, you will need to build out a sales team at some point. Even if you don’t think you need to. It really comes down to two fundamental realities in software: (a) companies are happy to spend vast amounts of money on software that solve important problems and (b) it is rather difficult to sell software for tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars consistently and predictably by simply waiting for customers to come to your website and entering their credit card details.

This is even more true if you have raised Venture Capital funding. Venture funding is the business equivalent of rocket fuel — it’s money given with the expectation of aggressive revenue growth to follow, year after year after year. Alongside they money you’ve raised, you’ve also acquired a charter: you need to build a machine that hires, ramps and manages a large number of salespeople. 

Luckily, this is the sort of problem that has been figured out. The San Francisco Bay Area is stacked with people who understand the specific nuances of selling software. There’s also a wealth of experienced operators available to hire on as either full time leaders, or as part time consultants. 

The stakes are high. If you aren’t able to hire people, you won’t hit your revenue numbers, and your odds of success (and even survival) decrease dramatically. VC funding means you can grow in a very different way than a traditional business would. It’s one of the reasons you see a number of SaaS businesses approaching $20, 30 and even $100s of millions in annual recurring revenue, within the first ten years of the companies’  lives. It’s also incredibly important you hire the right people - sales reps are expensive, with a single Account Executive easily running $20k per month fully loaded (base + ramp + benefits + office space + expenses adds up quickly!)  

Getting Outside Help

As you continue to scale your sales team, you’ll likely need help from external recruiters. External recruiters can be extremely helpful for three reasons.

1: They’ve had a lot of conversations with the sort of people you want to hire. 

A good external recruiter should have a detailed understanding of the sort of salesperson you need (and where to find them). The hiring needs of a company that sells a transactional product with a contract value of less than $10k per year to sales or marketing organizations are going to be vastly different to a company that sells solutions that start at $250k annually to CTOs. Different customers require different types of salespeople with varying levels of technical competence. 

2: Winning talent in a candidate's market 

The price of admission in large metropolitan areas like the Bay Area is extraordinarily high. In some ways, running a startup here is like being the best runner in your hometown, and then waking up in the Olympics. Sure, you’ve got a product that works, and you’ve found some demand, and even raised funding from a reputable VC firm, but everyone else has that too. More often than not, you’ll be competing with a number of other firms for talent. Moving fast in the recruitment process is one of your best defenses against larger firms (this is particularly crucial when you go to hire your first rep). 

3: Speeding things up

Hiring is simply another sales process. You need to strike a balance between qualifying hard and getting deals closed. If you don’t qualify hard enough, you’ll end up spinning your wheels (or much worse, in this case, hiring the wrong team). But at the same time, you can’t spend the next six months exclusively talking to 500 people. Outsourcing the work of finding, initially qualifying and getting candidates excited about your company to someone who’s done this a number of times is a very easy way to take a lot of work off your plate.   

Three Types of External Recruiters

Assuming you have decided to work with an outside recruiter, the next question becomes “what type of recruiting org is the right match for my company?” External recruiters can be categorized into three organizational structures. 

1: Large generalist recruitment agencies

Like the largest firms in your respective software niche, the major advantage of big recruitment agencies tends to lie in their scale and distribution. Larger recruiting agencies are often cheaper (and in my experience, more likely to drop their rates to win business). 

Things that you want to understand when talking to a large recruiting agency: 

  • What is their business model - do they mostly hire contract workers or are they focused on permanent placements? 

  • Within a business, does this recruiter (and agency) specialize in any area?

  • How familiar is this agency with standard software metrics and expectations?

  • Are they focused on resume screening based on inbound candidates & job boards, or are they specifically head-hunting individuals that match the profile you’re looking for?

  • What does their fill rate look like? 

It’s worth making the distinction between permanent and contract agencies, as the workflow and speed of hire tend to be very different. Of the thousands of candidates I’ve spoken to as a recruiter, I’ve only spoken to one who wasn’t hired as a permanent employee.

As you go through the process of talking to agencies, pay attention to how eager they are to start working on a search. A common strategy that some hiring managers use involves signing up with a number of recruiting agencies to fight it out to make a single placement. This process tends to involve a lot of coordination on the hiring manager's behalf as you need to manage multiple recruiters, none of whom are making you a particularly high priority

Just like you want to qualify your prospects, good recruiters will want to make sure they’re spending their time in an effective manner. 

2: Individual professionals

The real upside of dealing with an individual professional is they bring niche expertise, which tends to increase the likelihood they are aligned with the needs of the hiring manager. This is something recruiters have a bad reputation for (see the ongoing meme about IT recruiters not knowing the difference between Java & Javascript).

Like most services businesses, starting out as an external recruiter is a capital light exercise - all you need is a phone, a laptop and a LinkedIn account. Anyone can say that they’re able to help you with it, however, like any business partner, quality and results between individuals varies wildly. 

Things you want to understand when dealing with an individual recruiter:

  • How well do they know the space?

  • Does their experience match with the hiring profile you’re looking for?

  • How many placements are they trying to make a month? 

  • Is this recruiter focused on maximizing their earnings, or optimizing their lifestyle? 

At an industry standard placement fee of 25% of candidates’ first year salary, a talented individual recruiter can earn upwards of $250k annually without a tremendous amount of effort, and with a relatively low cost of doing business. The economics of running a recruiting firm become substantially worse once you start hiring staff for your own recruiting operation . Now that recruiter will need office space, a proper CRM, oh and the most expensive bit - other people. At this stage recruiters experience most of the downsides of being a larger company - you have to paddle a lot harder just to keep a larger vessel moving at the same speed. 

3: Specialized recruitment agencies

I’m somewhat biased (I work at The Collective Search - a specialized software sales recruiting agency). That said, I think using niche recruitment agencies make the most sense as you blend the two benefits - you get better reach into the market, but also get the specialized knowledge of what the market is actually doing. Recruiting is changing, especially in such competitive talent markets. Recruiters can’t just rely on setting up job advertisements and then sitting back while they wait for great candidates to apply (after all, if your careers page was delivering all the candidates you ever needed, why even hire a recruiter?). 

Within software sales hiring, we’ve seen job advertisements to be entirely unproductive, except for hiring junior talent without sales experience. This is the one exception to the rule, as the key determining factor is if the candidates are willing to work a sales job (most college grads don’t). 

Irrespective of the type of recruiting organization you decide to partner with, done right, recruiting should be a partnership, where you can trust the candidates you’re sent are worth your time. Running a venture-backed startup is hard! A good recruiter should be able to make the entire hiring process much simpler, faster and less stressful. Their focus shouldn’t be on collecting a fee, but rather on becoming aligned with your objectives - on building out a team that will be able to go the distance. 

[Webinar] Adapting to a Future Normal - Building and Refining a Durable Revenue Model

Building and refining a durable revenue model for B2B - BFGC __ KLP.jpg

I recently hosted a webinar for the Kiwi Landing Pad. We covered how businesses can sell and market products during a pandemic without coming across as… well, slimy.

Here’s a link where you can watch a replay:

https://www.crowdcast.io/e/building-and-refining-a-durable-revenue-model-for-B2B/register

And if you’re pressed for time, here’s the summary slide:

Screen Shot 2020-05-14 at 9.18.30 AM.png